AEM vs North Dakota – In support of motion to compel

Memorandum In Support Of The Manufacturers’ Motion to Compel NDIDA's Response To Document Request No. 4 and to Make Matthew Larsgaard Available For Supplemental Deposition.  

Exhibit A – Manufacturers' First Requests – 9 pages

Exhibit B – State of North Dakota and Intervenor North Dakota Implement Dealers – 9 pages

Exhibit C – Deposition of Matthew Larsgaard – 26 pages

Exhibit D – Amended Responses to First Requests – 5 pages

Exhibit E – Additional Documents – 2 pages

Exhibit F – NDIDA's Privilege Log – 5 pages

Exhibit G – Order from Western District of Michigan -12 pages